Collapsible containers are typically two to three times the cost of a standard container. The question is whether the use of a collapsible
It is essential that we collectively find appropriate and sustainable ways to fund this significant amount. U.S. airports are well known for delivering cost- effective projects that
The implementation of collapsible containers provides a new perspective for logistics cost savings, since using collapsible containers reduces the frequency of shipping freight.
The costs and benefits of using foldable containers in these logistic concepts are calculated and compared with the situation in which standard containers are used. It is shown
Building multi-megawatt depots at US airports will help overcome a significant barrier in EV charging accessibility. A growing number of airports can build fast-charging hubs capable of
At VRR, we strive to create ULD imbalance solutions. Learn how our collapsible containers will help in solving the global Imbalance in ULDs.
Are shipping containers outdated? The intermodal shipping container is 70 years old. Over the years it has been refined but ownership costs have increased. For example, this
Our collapsible containers decrease the environmental impact of returning empty ULDs by air or sea. You can return up to six stacked containers on a plane for the same
Our collapsible containers decrease the environmental impact of returning empty ULDs by air or sea. You can return up to six stacked
Your Professional background?What Causes ''Empty Running''?Who Inspires You?Empty containers clog roads and ship terminals, causing port congestion and leaving little space to unload ships. This then forces many ships to wait offshore, wasting resources and slowing the supply chain to a crawl. The problem disappears only as the ships sail away.See more on supplychaindigital Author: Sean AshcroftRMI
Building multi-megawatt depots at US airports will help overcome a significant barrier in EV charging accessibility. A growing number of airports can build fast-charging hubs capable of
The main difference between these three models relates to the materials in use. These materials vary in terms of weight, durability,
The main difference between these three models relates to the materials in use. These materials vary in terms of weight, durability, and price. The weight differentials are
Collapsible containers are typically two to three times the cost of a standard container. The question is whether the use of a collapsible container can reduce costs to such
A study by the Boston Consulting Group revealed it costs the shipping industry almost US$20 billion each year in repositioning empty containers. One out of every three
A study by the Boston Consulting Group revealed it costs the shipping industry almost US$20 billion each year in repositioning empty
The Southern African solar container market is experiencing significant growth, with demand increasing by over 420% in the past five years. Containerized solar solutions now account for approximately 38% of all temporary and mobile solar installations in the region. South Africa leads with 45% market share, driven by mining operations, agricultural applications, remote communities, and construction site power needs that have reduced energy costs by 60-70% compared to diesel generators. The average system size has increased from 40kW to over 250kW, with innovative container designs cutting transportation costs by 65% compared to traditional solutions. Emerging technologies including bifacial modules and integrated energy management have increased energy yields by 25-35%, while modular designs and local assembly have created new economic opportunities across the solar container value chain. Typical containerized projects now achieve payback periods of 3.5-5.5 years with levelized costs below R1.40/kWh.
Containerized energy storage solutions are revolutionizing power management across South Africa's industrial and commercial sectors. Mobile 20ft and 40ft BESS containers now provide flexible, scalable energy storage with deployment times reduced by 70% compared to traditional stationary installations. Advanced lithium-ion technologies (LFP and NMC) have increased energy density by 40% while reducing costs by 35% annually. Intelligent energy management systems now optimize charging/discharging cycles based on real-time electricity pricing (including Eskom time-of-use tariffs), increasing ROI by 50-70%. Safety innovations including advanced thermal management and integrated fire suppression have reduced risk profiles by 90%. These innovations have improved project economics significantly, with commercial and industrial energy storage projects typically achieving payback in 2.5-4.5 years through peak shaving, demand charge reduction, and backup power capabilities. Recent pricing trends show standard 20ft containers (250kWh-850kWh) starting at R1.6 million and 40ft containers (850kWh-2.5MWh) from R3.2 million, with flexible financing including lease-to-own and energy-as-a-service models available.